Empowering Respiratory Therapists with AI-Driven Clinical Intelligence

Blog


More than 1 million mechanically ventilated patients are treated in U.S. ICUs each year. These patients are at risk for ventilator-associated events, lung injury, and prolonged ICU stays – often due to the challenges of identifying when to escalate or de-escalate support.

RTs must juggle lung-protective strategies, ventilator optimization, and institutional protocols, all while manually reviewing fragmented data from multiple systems. Without continuous, real-time decision support, opportunities for intervention can easily be missed.


Accurate timing of extubation is critical: delays increase infection risk, while premature removal can lead to reintubation. Etiometry surfaces key indicators such as respiratory drive, sedation level, and hemodynamic stability to inform readiness.

Esteban et al. (2004, NEJM) found delayed extubation increases morbidity.

Hames et al. (2025, Pediatric Critical Care Medicine) reported that elevated IDO₂ or IVCO₂ levels before extubation were linked to higher failure odds (OR 1.77; 95% CI 1.01–3.12).

Clark et al. (2025, Journal of Pediatric Critical Care) showed a 30% reduction in postoperative ventilation time and 20% shorter ICU stays after Etiometry’s SBT tool implementation—with extubation failure dropping from 13% to 0%.


AI isn’t replacing clinical expertise – it’s amplifying it. For RTs, Etiometry acts as a trusted copilot, continuously monitoring and surfacing insights to support the best possible care.

As ICU workloads grow and staffing challenges persist, AI-enabled respiratory management is becoming essential—not just for efficiency, but for patient safety and outcomes.


References

Hames D, et al. Extubation Failure in Neonates Following Congenital Cardiac Surgery. Pediatr Crit Care Med. Feb 10, 2025.

Esteban A, et al. Extubation Outcomes in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2004.

Kallet RH, et al. Respiratory Therapists’ Adherence to Lung-Protective Ventilation. Respir Care. 2016.

Clark G, et al. Automated Spontaneous Breathing Trial Performance Tool… J Pediatr Crit Care. 2025;12(1):1–7.


Contact Us

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name(Required)
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy andTerms of Service apply.

References
Sinha, S, Morrow, D, Kapur, N. et al. 2025 Concise Clinical Guidance: An ACC Expert Consensus Statement on the Evaluation and Management of Cardiogenic Shock: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee. JACC. 2025 Apr, 85 (16) 1618–1641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2025.02.018

Early Prediction of Cardiogenic Shock Using Machine Learning https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35911549/

The Lancet: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2824%2901818- X/fulltext

References to earlier recognition are based on published research and do not imply predictive or diagnostic functions of the Etiometry Platform.tform.


Related